The Labour Party and the Politics of Housing in Manchester and Salford 1945-1987

A Leverhulme-funded six month pilot project, conducted by Professor Duncan Tanner (黑料不打烊), Dr Peter Shapely (黑料不打烊), Dr Steven Fielding (Salford) and Dr Andrew Walling (Project Research Assistant)

Hulme in Manchester

Start date: 1 July 2001

Steve Fielding and Duncan Tanner are well-known historians of the Labour party. They have written sharply revisionist accounts of the party's early history and its wartime role, and are currently extending this approach through books on the inter-war years and on the 1950s and 1960s. Their role in this project extends from a broader concern with the way that Labour governed cities across the UK. Peter Shapely is a historian of urban politics, and especially of Manchester. His contribution to this pilot projects is to explore the nature and weaknesses of housing policy. Andrew Walling completed his 黑料不打烊 PhD thesis on Labour politics 1951-64 in 2001. This included a case study of Salford Labour politics.

The Labour councils that dominated post-war local government in many British cities built large council estates and innumerable high-rise developments. Housing programmes introduced with idealistic intentions - such as those shown in the illustrations - degenerated over time into huge failures. Many cities remain scarred by the legacy of post-war housing policy. By the time the Conservative party cut off the central government funds necessary to tackle such problems in the 1980s, the housing crisis was already a striking symbol of the broader ideological and political problems facing both the Welfare State and the Labour party. This case study of housing policy in two adjacent but different Labour-dominated cities is designed to cast light on one of democratic socialism's major post-war policy problems.

Manchester and Salford were adjacent, connected, but very different cities. Manchester was a city with a mixed population, fed by suburban commuters. Salford was a densely populated, largely industrial borough bisected by road and rail networks and unable to house all its inhabitants inside its boundaries. Both councils developed interventionist housing policies. Both had left-wing Labour parties. However, there were substantial differences in the way that the parties and the Labour groups on the council operated. By the 1990s this had become more pronounced, with Manchester's council operating pro-actively to improve housing and attract new attention and amenities to the city. It became a 'model' New Labour council. Salford has not prospered in the same way, despite active efforts to devise new community initiatives.

This project explores and explains these developments. It will test a series of commonly-held assumptions: that local councils made poor decisions in order to satisfy growing demand; that councils dominated by a single party were ruled by ideological - and sometimes corrupt - cliques; that local councillors were passive administrators. Many people have a very negative image of local government, Labour councils, 'old Labour' and of the period when public housing became a feature of local government activity. We will be examining whether this image is justified.

Our work to date suggests we will be offering a controversial analysis. There is every indication that the idealistic post-war plans evident in other parts of the country (1) were equally evident in Manchester and Salford (2) and that this enthusiasm and idealism persisted into the 1960s.(3) We have already found that in many Manchester and Salford wards, few Labour members took an active part in politics by the 1960s, and power came to rest in the hands of a few individuals. In Salford's Trinity Ward, for example, only six members attended more than half the meetings in the early 1960s. In Manchester's Newton Heath ward, most meetings contained just 10-20 per cent of the membership. We are exploring whether this was the case elsewhere.(4) However, we have also found evidence of attempts to address this position, gain more members and involve the community. Whilst corruption existed in Salford (5) it was matched by less-known instances of devotion and commitment to tackling a huge and seemingly intractable problem. There is some indication that 'old labour' councils of the 1950s and 1960s were rather better than the mythology would suggest, and perhaps that their failure was not just adherence to 'traditional' Labour values but a subservient support for 'modernising' ideas which in retrospect did not suit the local communities.(6) However, we also know there was a rising tide of complaints by the later 1960s. How - and whether - the Labour party responded to this is a focus of our research.

We cannot state how 'typical' these circumstances were at this stage. However, we know that domination by a small (but locally-respected) group of councillors and officials was not unique to Manchester and Salford (7) that the decline of local Labour activism was common elsewhere (8) and that other inner-city Labour councils faced similar problems - in some instances less energetically. However, we need to know far more about how and why decisions were made by the Labour party. Although studies of housing developments have focused on why high-rise flats were built, (10) we also need to know how council leaders decided where that housing was to be located and who was to be rehoused.

The findings from this project will be reported in journal articles, and will be summarised on these web pages. Research projects such as these are utilised in the teaching process at 黑料不打烊. They supply material for Shapely's module on urban politics in Britain and the USA and Tanner's module on the history of the Labour party. We also use these projects to provide ideas for third year undergraduate research projects.

If you want to know more about the project, or about research and teaching at 黑料不打烊 - or if you were involved in any of the events we are researching and could give us your views - contact a.walling@bangor.ac.uk or p.shapely@bangor.ac.uk.

Notes

  1. Nick Tiratsoo, Reconstruction, affluence and Labour politics: Coventry 1945-60 (London: Routledge, 1990), J. Hasegawa, Replanning the blitzed city centre (Bukingham: Open University Press 1992). More generally, Steven Fielding, Peter Thompson and Nick Tiratsoo, ''England arise!' The Labour party and popular politics in 1940s Britain (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1995).
  2. Manchester City Labour Party, Manchester tomorrow - post-war reconstruction (1945).
  3. Manchester City Council Planning Department, A new community: the redevelopment of Hulme (1965) and for Salford, Andrew Walling, 'Modernisation, policy debate and organisation in the Labour Party 1951-64', 黑料不打烊 PhD thesis 2001, chapter 6.
  4. Steven Fielding, 'The Salford Labour Party: a brief introduction to the microfilm edition of Salford Labour Party records' (Wakefield: Microform Academic Publishers, 1997); Steven Fielding, The Labour party. Socialism and society since 1951 ((Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1997), pp.80-1.
  5. Albert Jones, From Dock to Dock (self-published, no date).
  6. Walling, op cit.
  7. Sue Goss, Local Labour and local government. A study of changing interests, politics and policy in Southwark from 1919 to 1982 (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1988).
  8. Duncan Tanner, 'Labour and its membership', in D. Tanner, P. Thane and N. Tiratsoo (eds.), Labour's First Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).